Site Loader

  Paragraph #1:  Facts of the case The case Korematsu v.United States was argued in the supreme court on Oct 10 – 11, 1944.originally this case started because a man named Fred Korematsu that had ancestors  from Japan he was a topical man until he was arrested because he wouldn’t leave California. This lead to confusion because Fred was born in  America which makes him an American citizen. This was lead to the Stone Court and it went to supreme court. Paragraph #2 Continued: Legal Questions This supreme court case addressed the 5th and 14th  amendments in the constitution. The 5th amendment states deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law and  Fred Korematsu was a Japanese American living in California who,after being ordered into a Japanese internment camp, refused to leave his city.Korematsu claimed that the Executive Order violated his personal rights. With the 14th amendment  “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”(https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv). This means that the united states can’t force fred to fight in a war or arrest him for not going.  With regards to , Korematsu v.United States the U.S. Supreme Court needed to answer the following question: “did the president and congress go beyond their war power by implementing exclusion and restricting the rights of americans of japanese descent?” Paragraph #3: Arguments In this case the appellant was Korematsu and he argued that it’s not right to throw a person to jail and camp just because of someone’s ancestry. For the RespondentThe united states say that the japanese can be spies and cause harm to the united states. Paragraph #4: Opinion of the CourtThe Justice who authored the Majority Opinion was Black, joined by Stone, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Rutledge and they  held that he need to protect against spying outweighed the rights of Americans of Japanese attack , such as Korematsu.With the  Concurring Opinion there was nothing. For Dissenting Opinion there was Roberts Murphy and Jackson. They stated   the military order was racist; an attempt to hold a person guilty for the crime of being born of Japanese ancestry.Paragraph #5: Outcome of CaseThe final decision was made  after 6-3 votes. The final outcome of the case was the majority opinion that they ” need to protect against spying outweighed the rights of Americans of Japanese attack , such as Korematsu.” (This is from Majority Opinion for korematsu v, united states) this means that america will find a better way to find and punish spies. Paragraph #6: Response to Court DecisionFor this case the court they decided “The Court sided with the government and held that the need to protect against espionage outweighed Korematsu’s rights. Justice Black argued that compulsory exclusion, though constitutionally suspect, is justified during circumstances of “emergency and peril.”(https://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1955/323us214) . when this got public there were mixed emotion. Paragraph #7: Impact on Decisions, Citizens and LawsA similar case is brown v more education. In this case colored people couldn’t get all of their education because the white people weren’t convertible. This is similar because if japanese lived in america they couldn’t get all of their education or owe a home for more than 3 years. Paragraph #8: The Decision TodayThe decision from  Korematsu v.United States is still standing tobay. And no problems haven’t been heard tobay. A case that is close to this is the virginia v love. This case is about a couple breaking the virginia law with being in love with the same gender. This is similar because they are breaking the 14 amendment.Paragraph #9: Your Personal OpinionWith this case i agree with the court because no one should be bullied for their nationality. The 14th and the 5th amendment follows my opinion on this case because they say that people shall be treated the same.this affects the american society because this can make their society low and ruen there background.Paragraph # 10: Impact on Your LifeThis case is about a man named Fred Korematsu that had ancestors  from Japan he was a typical man until he was arrested because he wouldn’t leave California. This lead to confusion because Fred was born in  America which makes him an American citizen. This affects a 13 year old life because my family is not from america but because we are all citizens if russia or ukraine attack america my family and i will have to go thru all that the japanese had to go thru. For example not get a lot of education of own a home for more than 3 years.

Post Author: admin

x

Hi!
I'm Erica!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out